|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and Education Reports |
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After students reviewed the IAH CD, we found a decrease at four universities, an increase at one university, and no change at the remaining two universities in students interest in working in some area of international veterinary medicine. However, none of the differences was statistically significant.
Key Words: international computer-based education veterinary medicine
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rapid development of new computer technologies to deliver information is already having a major impact on veterinary education, and it is likely that this influence will continue to grow in the future.5 Since most veterinary students today have at least basic computer skills, using tools such as CD-ROMs to expose them to a variety of international animal issues seems a promising avenue. The CD-ROM medium is widely used to distribute multimedia programs, especially those requiring large digital video files,5 which makes it a very beneficial tool for presenting animal-health issues in other countries to veterinary students at home or in a classroom. Computer-based instruction may be an excellent, cost-effective way of exposing students to veterinary issues in an international context without requiring them to travel great distances or spend large amounts of money. The published proceedings from the first US symposium on the internationalization of veterinary education recommend the use of information technology and the development of modules or auto-tutorials addressing global dimensions of veterinary medicine to counter the lack of international content in veterinary curricula.4 As there is a significant need to expose veterinarians to animal-health scenarios outside their native countries,1 the potential for computer-based instruction to stimulate and nurture student interest in international animal-health issues warranted investigation.
While many studies have evaluated whether or not factual information can be effectively communicated using computer-aided tools,6 thus far none has focused on establishing and changing students attitudes toward international animal-health issues. This study used a pre-CD questionnaire to describe veterinary students attitudes toward and interest in international veterinary medicine and subsequently evaluated whether or not viewing an international animal-health CD affected these attitudes or interests by comparing baseline information recorded in the first questionnaire with responses to a similar post-CD questionnaire, completed four weeks after the CDs were distributed.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Design and Data Collection
The University of California, Davis (UC Davis), and six other veterinary schools/colleges participated in the study. In the other six schools, faculty members who were known to the primary investigators and had access to a course that veterinary students would be taking for at least four weeks between January and June 2004 were asked to collaborate in the study. Faculty members met with their groups of students, introduced the study, and asked for volunteers for "a study involving computerized educational modules and international veterinary medicine." Faculty collaborators were provided with a standardized script to be read when distributing surveys; two different questionnaires; and an appropriate number of each of the two CDs.
Two questionnaires were used in the study. The purpose of the first (pre-CD) questionnaire was to gather initial data on students attitudes and interests regarding international animal-health issues before they examined the CD. The pre-CD survey was also used to establish background information on students international experiences and previous computer instruction. Changes from baseline information obtained in the pre-CD questionnaire were detected using the second (post-CD) survey, administered four weeks after students received their study CD. The pre-CD and post-CD questionnaires had the same "interest" and "attitude" questions, in order to allow comparisons for individual students. "Control" questions were asked on the pre-CD and post-CD questionnaires to ascertain students knowledge of specific international veterinary issues and parasites of veterinary significance. Both questionnaires were approved by the University of California, Davis, Human Subjects Review Board. Informed consent was obtained from students: all were notified that participation was anonymous and voluntary and would not influence their course grade.
The study population consisted of students enrolled in veterinary schools or colleges in the United States, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom between January and June 2004 who volunteered for the study. Five US veterinary schools were included: UC Davis, the University of Minnesota, Iowa State University, Washington State University, and Michigan State University. Two European veterinary universities were also surveyed: Utrecht University in the Netherlands and the University of Glasgow in Scotland. Throughout this article, results will be presented in this order, which is the chronological order in which each university entered the study from January and June 2004. Participating students were in their first, second, third, or fourth year of the veterinary program.
CDs were arranged in random order, and sets were mailed to participating schools; within each set, each CD had a unique identification number. As students received their pre-CD questionnaires, they were given a CD from the randomly arranged group and asked to record the CD number, so that, at the end of the study, they could put that number on the post-CD survey and receive the alternative CD. The primary incentive for students to participate in the study was to receive two free educational CDs. At the time the pre-CD survey was distributed, the faculty member read from a standardized script, reminding the students that their participation was voluntary, that they had four weeks to review the CDs, and that they were not to share or discuss their CD with classmates. Students were instructed to review their CD at some point in the four-week period; CD evaluation was performed on the students own time, unconnected to the class involved in the distribution of the CDs and surveys. At the end of the designated period, the post-CD questionnaire was distributed; students were required to record their CD number on this survey, so that it could be matched and compared with pre-CD survey data. Upon collection of the post-CD questionnaire, each student was given a copy of the other CD.
Data Presentation and Statistical Analysis
Background information on prior international exposure and previous experience with computer-based teaching methods was obtained in the pre-CD questionnaire, which also gathered baseline information on participants age and gender.
Primary outcomes included one specific question regarding interest and three "attitude" questions dealing with international veterinary medical issues. To facilitate the analysis, these questions were exactly the same on both pre-CD and post-CD surveys. Students were included in the final data analysis only if they returned a post-CD questionnaire with a CD number exactly matching a pre-CD questionnaire. Surveys that did not have a matching counterpart or that were missing data on a specific question of interest were not included in the analysis.
The "interest" question was, "Are you interested in practicing veterinary medicine or participating in animal health research in a country other than the one where you are currently receiving veterinary education/training?" A chi-square test8 was used to evaluate the statistical significance of any observed change in proportions between pre- and post-CD data.
The three "attitude" questions are shown in Figure 1. A scale line of approximately 14 cm (5.5") in length was used to assess the three "attitude" questions on both surveys (see Figure 1 for design of the scale lines). For statistical analysis, the distance from the left of the scale to the place where the student placed an X on the line was measured in centimeters with a standard ruler. The post-CD response was subtracted from the pre-CD response to give a value for each of the three questions. A two-way ANOVA9 was performed on each of the three "attitude" questions. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS Proprietary Software Release 8.2 for Windows.b The null hypothesis for this test was that the median difference between post and pre-CD questionnaires was zero, indicating that the CD viewed, the school attended, or an interaction between the CD viewed and school attended had no effect in changing student's attitudes. The two-sided alternative hypothesis was that the median difference in attitude scores was not zero, indicating that the CD, the school, or an interaction between the two did have an influence on the students, either positive or negative. Therefore, the covariates entered into the model were CD received (IAH or PL), school attended, and the CD/school interaction. A rank transformation was performed on two of the three questions to satisfy the model assumptions; p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
When asked about previous computer experiences, 91% of the students completing the pre-CD survey (411/451) reported having used computer-aided teaching programs in their university education. Nearly all students reported that the computer-based programs they had formerly used in their studies were informative. Few students (range: 0–13%) at any university reported previously using a computer-based program that was focused on epidemiology and approaches to disease investigation; 19–68% of students responding reported using programs focused on animal health and problem solving (see Figure 2).
|
The final question on the pre-CD survey asked students, "What are some of the advantages of teaching veterinary students about animal disease problems and approaches to animal health investigations in other countries?" Of all 447 students who replied, only four (<1%) believed that there would be little or no benefit to veterinarians or veterinary students from teaching this topic. In all schools, students saw several potential benefits to teaching various aspects of international veterinary medicine. The advantage mentioned by the highest percentage of students was that teaching veterinary students about animal-health issues in other countries would be helpful in providing information on foreign animal diseases.
Post-CD Survey
About two-thirds of students who completed the pre-CD survey also completed a post-CD survey. It is important to determine how similar the two populations were (i.e., the population of students completing only the pre-CD questionnaire versus the population completing both questionnaires), because only data from the latter group were used to evaluate possible changes in attitudes after viewing the CDs. Demographic information for the population of students completing both pre-CD and post-CD questionnaires was nearly identical to that for the population completing only the first survey, as shown in Table 1. Therefore, we do not believe it likely that the one-third of students who "dropped out" of the study created bias in the results.
Most students found both CDs relatively uncomplicated to use. CD usability was recorded by means of an X on a scale from 1 to 5 (5 = "extremely easy to use"); most (78%) of the 281 students reported a usability score of 3 or more; 17% recorded a usability score equal to 3; and only 5% (14/281) gave a usability score of less than 3. For US veterinary students, the PL CD had a slightly higher mean usability score than the IAH CD (4.36 versus 4.16); the opposite was true for non-US students, who gave the IAH CD a mean usability score of 4.06, versus 3.63 for the PL CD. University origin did not significantly affect students usability ratings for the CDs.
Additional questions about time spent reviewing the CDs and video accessibility were asked only of those students who received the IAH CD. The last row of Table 1 shows the average amount of time students spent reviewing the entire IAH CD, ranging from 64 minutes (UC Davis) to 117 minutes (Washington State). Since the videos on the IAH CD were intended to enhance the learning experience, students were asked whether or not they were able to view all the videos. Of the students who initially received the IAH CD, between 45% (UC Davis) and 82% (Glasgow) were able to view all videos; these figures indicate that many students (18–55%) were unable to view all videos from cases documented on the IAH CD.
Students general feelings about computerized teaching programs they had previously used were assessed in the pre-CD survey. Therefore, questions on the post-CD survey were geared to assess students feelings about the particular CD they were given in the study. Students were given the same set of choices as on the pre-CD survey; their responses are recorded in Table 2. Almost all students (96%) reported that the study CDs, like computer-based learning tools they had previously used, were informative. The most notable difference between other programs and the CDs provided by this study was that the study CDs were considered more helpful in focusing on epidemiology and approaches to disease investigation.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Evaluation of changes in veterinary students interests and attitudes focused on the IAH CD. However, a second CD was incorporated in the study as a control, in order to minimize potential error due to the Hawthorne Effect. This effect, which is usually positive or beneficial, may occur when people know they are being measured or studied and tend to modify their behavior as a result.10 The name derives from observational studies of workers at an electric plant in Hawthorne, IL.10 The PL CD was selected as the control because it was a newly developed interactive CD that covers different content in an encyclopedic fact-based approach, rather than the case-based format of the IAH CD.
One explanation for the lack of change in students interest levels and attitudes toward international veterinary medicine after viewing the IAH CD is that students did not consider the material compelling or well presented. This does not seem to have been true, judging by the favorable comments from students. Another possible explanation is that 18–55% of students reported not being able to view all the videos on the IAH CD. All the software required to view the videos is on the CD, with instructions for its installation on computers that do not already have QuickTimec installed. However, some students may not have read the technical instructions section of the CD, instead deciding to forgo viewing the videos. Furthermore, students at Utrecht University are not allowed to add or remove programs from faculty computers, which may have created another constraint. The videos were specifically designed to make each case more realistic and to allow the student viewer to feel "on location," talking with veterinarians and animal owners involved in the case. Students who were not able to view the videos, which are one of the highlights of the IAH modules, may have become frustrated and given up on trying to navigate the rest of the case or subsequent cases, and this may have left them with a negative attitude for the entire study. Computer-aided instruction programs are slightly less effective for students with more negative attitudes about using computers.6
Another possible reason that no positive effect was measured in students attitudes toward international veterinary medicine after viewing the CD was that participating students were a self-selected volunteer group, probably already interested in international animal health, and this further exposure to the subject did not affect their attitudes. Of the estimated 707 students initially approached to volunteer for the study at the seven participating universities, only 451 completed the pre-CD questionnaire, and just under two-thirds of those 451students completed the post-CD survey as well. Also, not every student answered every question on both surveys, and those questionnaires without matching responses were excluded from the analysis for that question. However, as explained earlier, the sub-population of students who completed both pre- and post-CD questionnaires was similar to the group that entered the study (i.e., completed the first questionnaire), and therefore we do not believe that or data were biased in this way.
The IAH CD was originally designed to be used in a class, but in this trial students were given no instructions or guidance for optimizing the features provided by the CDs, and there was no organized discussion with faculty afterwards. While the IAH CD may be useful in introducing international animal health scenarios, it is likely that, as has been found in other studies,11 direct instructor contact is necessary for integration and retention of the subjects and skills presented.
Computer CDs are already being used as teaching supplements in many veterinary courses.11–14 Computer-based programs allow educators to reach more people, encourage peer-to-peer learning, and accommodate different learning styles while also offering an element of fun.15 Veterinary students abilities and attitudes towards computers and associated software products, such as CD-ROMs, influence the degree to which computer-aided instruction can be used effectively.6 Although the IAH CD apparently did not change students interest levels or attitudes, many students did find it easy to use and reported that it was informative. These results are consistent with those of another study, which showed that although students exposed to traditional methods of teaching veterinary surgery performed better than those exposed to a computer-aided software program, the computer-aided instruction program was well received by the students and was found to be an effective training tool.11
Currently, some veterinary schools and colleges are exploring the option of expanding interactive case-based computer CDs to interactive Web sites for the purpose of supplying and enhancing distance learning.5 One of the suggestions made at a US symposium on the internationalization of veterinary education was to increase international content and awareness in the veterinary curriculum by using information technology to access international content, materials, expertise, and opportunities.4 The IAH CD makes it possible to bring veterinary experiences from countries across the globe to students sitting at computers in their homes or in a classroom at their home institution. Therefore, the IAH CD and the principal concepts that it addresses could realistically and quite feasibly be a useful component for integrating international animal-health issues into veterinary education.
| CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Brigitte French, DVM, MPVM, is currently a captain in the US Air Force. E-mail: charliecallsign{at}hotmail.com. This article was submitted as part of the requirements for the Master of Preventive Veterinary Medicine degree at University of California, Davis.
David Hird, DVM, MPVM, PhD, is a professor in the Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 USA. E-mail: dwhird{at}ucdavis.edu.
Patrick Romano, MD, MPH, is Professor of Medicine and Pediatrics, Division of General Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California-Davis Medical Center, PSSB 2400, 4150 V Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 USA. E-mail: psromano{at}ucdavis.edu.
Rick Hayes is a member of the Computer Assisted Learning Facility, Office of the Dean, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 USA. E-mail: rhayes{at}ucdavis.edu.
Ard Nijhof, DVM, is a PhD student in the Department of Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, NL 3508 Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frans Jongejan, PhD, is a professor in the Department of Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, and in the Department of Tropical Veterinary Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort 0110, Republic of South Africa. E-mail: fjongejan{at}up.ac.za or f.jongejan{at}vet.uu.nl.
Dominic Mellor, BVMS, PhD, Dipl. ECVPH, MRCVS, is a member of the Institute of Comparative Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Garscube Estate, 464 Bearsden Road, Glasgow G61 1QH Scotland, UK. E-mail: d.mellor{at}vet.gla.ac.uk.
Randall Singer, DVM, MPVM, PhD, is an assistant professor in the Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, 300A Veterinary Sciences Building, 1971 Commonwealth Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA. E-mail: singe024{at}umn.edu.
Amanda Fine, VMD, is a member of the Population Medicine Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1314 USA. E-mail: finea{at}cvm.msu.edu. She is an instructor in the Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, and the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
John Gay, DVM, PhD, Dipl. ACVPM, is Associate Professor of Epidemiology at the Field Disease Investigation Unit, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, P.O. Box 647010, Pullman, WA 99164-7010 USA. E-mail: jmgay{at}vetmed.wsu.edu.
Radford Davis, DVM, MPH, Dipl. ACVPM, is Assistant Director of the Center for Food Security and Public Health and Assistant Professor of Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, 2132 Veterinary Medicine Building, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50013 USA. E-mail: rgdavis{at}iastate.edu.
Patricia Conrad, DVM, PhD, is a professor in the Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 USA. E-mail: paconrad{at}ucdavis.edu.
a See <http://www.calf.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/>; click "products" for the PL CD and "current projects" for the IAH CD. ![]()
b © 1999–2001, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC 27513-2414 USA <http://www.sas.com/> ![]()
c Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA 95014 USA <http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/win.html>. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A. Conrad, D. Hird, J. Arzt, R. H. Hayes, D. Magliano, J. Kasper, S. Morfin, and S. Pinney Interactive Computerized Learning Program Exposes Veterinary Students to Challenging International Animal-Health Problems J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(4): 497 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| AAVMC APPRECIATES THE SUPPORT OF OUR TWO PATRONS, HILL'S PET NUTRITION AND BAYER ANIMAL HEALTH, WHO IN COMBINATION ARE FULLY SUPPORTING THIS SITE. | |
![]() |
|
|
|
|