JVME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sprunger L
Right arrow Articles by Smith T
Related Collections
Right arrow Anatomy
Right arrow Educational Approaches for Learning
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Vol 32, Issue 2, 255-263
Copyright © 2005 by Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges


RESEARCH AND EDUCATION REPORTS

Reorganizing small animal gross anatomy: improving the faculty and student experience and incorporating non-technical competency development

LK Sprunger and TL Smith

Department of Veterinary and Comparative Anatomy, Pharmacology, and Physiology, Washington State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Pullman, WA, 99164-6520 USA. lsprunger@wsu.edu

The organization of the small animal gross anatomy course at Washington State University's College of Veterinary Medicine was modified in several ways over a two-year period. These modifications were motivated in part by the need to accommodate a larger number of students, but also by our desire to make more efficient use of faculty and student time as well as physical resources and to give our students opportunities to develop non-technical competencies such as communication and teamwork skills. The four major changes were (1) increasing dissection group size, (2) assigning specimens to dissection groups on a rotating basis, (3) reducing the amount of dissection time relative to time spent studying prepared specimens, and (4) introducing ''transition reviews,'' a limited form of peer teaching meant to emphasize peer interaction and communication skills rather than conveyance of specific and detailed subject matter. This article describes the details of these changes and evaluates their effectiveness based on faculty assessments, results from surveys of participating students, and comparison of examination performance and formal end-of-course student evaluations before and after reorganization of the course. Increasing the dissection group size and reducing per-student dissection time did not adversely affect student performance and were viewed at least neutrally or favorably by most students. Notably, the rotation of specimens and the transition reviews elicited strongly favorable responses from a large majority of students and had several beneficial effects of which students may not have been aware but which were apparent to participating faculty. Overall, the changes were well received by both faculty and students and were, in our view, of sufficient value that this course organization plan would be used regardless of class size.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvmeHome page
L. K. Sprunger
Facilitating Appreciation of Anatomical Variation and Development of Teamwork Skills in the Gross Anatomy Laboratory Using a Cadaver Reassignment System
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2008; 35(1): 110 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvmeHome page
G. A. Burns, K. L. Ruby, R. M. DeBowes, S. J. Seaman, and J. K. Brannan
Teaching Non-Technical (Professional) Competence in a Veterinary School Curriculum
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2006; 33(2): 301 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
AAVMC APPRECIATES THE SUPPORT OF OUR TWO PATRONS, HILL'S PET NUTRITION AND BAYER ANIMAL HEALTH, WHO IN COMBINATION ARE FULLY SUPPORTING THIS SITE.
Hill's Pet Nutrition
Upcoming Veterinary Education Meetings