JVME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryan M
Right arrow Articles by Baird A
Related Collections
Right arrow EAEVE
Right arrow Student Programs
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Vol 31, Issue 3, 242-254
Copyright © 2004 by Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges


EUROPEAN VETERINARY EDUCATION: STRUCTURING FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

Observations of veterinary medicine students' approaches to study in pre-clinical years

MT Ryan, JA Irwin, FJ Bannon, CW Mulholland, and AW Baird

Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland. marion.ryan@ucd.ie

RATIONALE FOR THIS STUDY: This study has two purposes. The first is to explore an instrument of evaluation of the approaches to study (deep, strategic, and surface) adopted by students in the pre-clinical years of their veterinary degree program. The second is to examine relationships between these approaches and a broad range of further factors deemed relevant to the veterinary medicine context. We envisage that a greater knowledge of how these students learn will aid curriculum reform in a way that will enrich the learning experience of veterinary students. METHODOLOGY: A questionnaire consisting of the 52-question Approaches to Study Inventory (ASI) and an additional 49 questions relating mainly to teaching, assessment, and study skills was distributed to 215 veterinary medicine (MVB) students in their pre-clinical years of study. Factor analysis was used to ensure that the ASI section of the questionnaire maintained previously reported structure. The internal reliability of the approaches measured was tested using Cronbach alpha analysis. The approaches were described as frequency distributions. Associations between the parameters (deep, strategic, and surface) and 49 additional context-specific factors were investigated using loglinear analysis. RESULTS: (1) Factor analysis revealed that the integrity and structure of the instrument in this context was generally comparable to previous studies. (2) The impact of a high workload was evident in the surface approach, with fear of failure becoming a strong motivating factor and syllabus boundness a widely used strategy. (3) Associations made between the approaches and 49 context-specific factors showed strong associations between both workload and lack of prior knowledge with the surface approach. (4) Grades were associated positively with both the deep and strategic approaches but negatively with the surface approach. (5) A range of learning and study skills were associated positively with the deep and strategic approaches and negatively with the surface approach. CONCLUSION: The ASI proved to be a reliable and insightful instrument, highlighting specific surface learning tendencies present in the group as well as a deep learning approach, the pattern of which deviates from previous studies on this subject. This study also confirms the value of some teaching practices as a means of supporting deep learning and perhaps challenging surface learning strategies. The prevalent perception of a high workload is notable, as is its positive association with surface learning.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvmeHome page
C. V. Horii
Teaching Insights from Adult Learning Theory
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(4): 369 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvmeHome page
C. L. Scudamore and S. H. Smith
Future Directions in Training Veterinarians for Careers in Toxicological Pathology in the United Kingdom
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(4): 450 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvmeHome page
M. T. Ryan and T. Sweeney
Integrating Molecular Biology into the Veterinary Curriculum
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(5): 658 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvmeHome page
T. Heath
The More Things Change, the More They Should Stay the Same
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2006; 33(2): 149 - 154.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvmeHome page
M. L. Doherty and B. R. Jones
Undergraduate Veterinary Education at University College Dublin: A Time of Change
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2006; 33(2): 214 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvmeHome page
M. T. Ryan and T. Sweeney
Genetic Susceptibility to Scrapie in Sheep: A Clinically Relevant Theme in Veterinary Medical Education
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2005; 32(4): 544 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
AAVMC APPRECIATES THE SUPPORT OF OUR TWO PATRONS, HILL'S PET NUTRITION AND BAYER ANIMAL HEALTH, WHO IN COMBINATION ARE FULLY SUPPORTING THIS SITE.
Hill's Pet Nutrition
Upcoming Veterinary Education Meetings