JVME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore D
Right arrow Articles by Overton M
Related Collections
Right arrow Continuing Education
Right arrow Food Animal - Food Services Veterinary Medicine - Food Safety
Right arrow Assessment
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Vol 31, Issue 2, 146-155
Copyright © 2004 by Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges


RESEARCH AND EDUCATION REPORTS

Levels of continuing veterinary medical education program evaluation: assessing a course on dairy reproductive management

DA Moore, RO Gilbert, W Thatcher, JE Santos, and MW Overton

University of California-Davis, VMTRC, 18830 Rd 112, Tulare, CA 93274 USA. dmoore@vmtrc.ucdavis.edu

There are four different levels of continuing education program evaluation: participant perceptions of the program or course; participant competence with new skills, knowledge, and abilities; participant performance or change in behavior; and health care or client outcomes, such as resultant changes in patient care or herd/flock production performance. The purpose of this article is to describe different levels of evaluation and demonstrate some methods used in evaluating a continuing veterinary medical education (CVME) course in dairy reproductive management. Participants' learning needs were assessed using learning stage theory and a pre-test of knowledge. Post-program assessments included a test of knowledge, a satisfaction survey, a commitment to change, and self-reported behavior change. The results of the evaluation indicate that self-reports of learning needs do not necessarily reflect actual needs and that satisfaction with a course does not necessarily indicate behavior change. Providers of CVME must recognize the value of program evaluation, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of different evaluation methods.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
AAVMC APPRECIATES THE SUPPORT OF OUR TWO PATRONS, HILL'S PET NUTRITION AND BAYER ANIMAL HEALTH, WHO IN COMBINATION ARE FULLY SUPPORTING THIS SITE.
Hill's Pet Nutrition
Upcoming Veterinary Education Meetings