JVME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis R
Right arrow Articles by Turnwald G
Related Collections
Right arrow Admissions
Right arrow Student Programs
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Vol 31, Issue 2, 128-137
Copyright © 2004 by Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges


RESEARCH AND EDUCATION REPORTS

Veterinary school admission interviews, part 3: strategies for increasing interview validity

RE Lewis, KL van Walsum, MM Spafford, JC Edwards, and GH Turnwald

Personnel Decisions International, 45 South Seventh St., Minneapolis, MN 55402 USA. bob.lewis@personneldecisions.com

The veterinary school admission interview is a widely used selection tool, yet concerns persist about its reliability, validity, and cost. Relative to medicine, optometry, and dentistry schools, veterinary schools have been more likely to conduct panel interviews and to fix the interview's weight in selection decisions, strategies that increase interview validity. This article provides strategies for further increasing the veterinary school interview's validity. Interview reliability and validity studies point to key strategies the veterinary school admissions committee can implement before the interview: (1) establishing the interview's purpose(s); (2) conducting a "job" analysis to identify desirable candidate skills, knowledge, and attributes; (3) developing a structured and panel interview where interviewers, if possible, are blind to other admission data; (4) training interviewers; (5) setting a reasonable interview schedule; and (6) determining methods for analyzing applicant data. During the interview, interviewers should proceed through a structured series of steps: (1) open the interview with a specified agenda; (2) probe for information using structured questions and anchored rating scales; (3) close the interview to allow for candidate questions; and (4) evaluate the interview data. After the interview, the admissions committee should (1) analyze the interview data within and across interviewers and (2) analyze the data across all selection tools in order to assign relative weights to the selection tools.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvmeHome page
H.S. van der Walt and G. Pickworth
Personality and Academic Performance of Three Cohorts of Veterinary Students in South Africa
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(3): 356 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
AAVMC APPRECIATES THE SUPPORT OF OUR TWO PATRONS, HILL'S PET NUTRITION AND BAYER ANIMAL HEALTH, WHO IN COMBINATION ARE FULLY SUPPORTING THIS SITE.
Hill's Pet Nutrition
Upcoming Veterinary Education Meetings