JVME
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Monahan C
Right arrow Articles by Yew A
Related Collections
Right arrow Case based Teachings
Right arrow Microbiology - Infectious Disease - Parisitology - Virology
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Vol 29, Issue 3, 186-192
Copyright © 2002 by Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges


THE VETERINARY TEACHER

Adapting a case-based, cooperative learning strategy to a veterinary parasitology laboratory

CM Monahan and AC Yew

Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. monahan.19@osu.edu

INTRODUCTION: Third-year veterinary students participate in a parasitology laboratory for instruction in diagnostic techniques. Course instructors adapted a case-based, cooperative learning approach to stimulate student involvement. Previously, students worked individually but shared common equipment in small groups. Peer interactions and discussions were not inherent in the format. Specimens were provided for practicing diagnostic techniques. METHODOLOGY: Students were assigned to cooperative learning groups of four students. Within each group, members were assigned distinct roles that rotated daily. Samples were presented as clinical cases, including history and signalment. Within groups, students performed role-specific duties and were expected to teach their component to other group members. Groups worked up their case for presentation to the class at the end of each period. Grading was unchanged from previous years, based on four individual quiz scores, two case reports, and a final practical exam. RESULTS: Student grades remained satisfactory and student feedback was highly favorable, the most common response being that group work enhanced understanding and that a case-based approach provided valuable clinical insights. An important comment was that peer teaching could be inconsistent; some students were concerned that important information was overlooked during the reciprocal teaching. Their recommendation was to verbalize expectations more clearly and to work with groups to facilitate reciprocal teaching.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvmeHome page
S. K. Abood
Teaching and Assessing Nutrition Competence in a Changing Curricular Environment
J Vet Med Educ, June 1, 2008; 35(2): 281 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvmeHome page
G. F. Grauer, S. D. Forrester, C. Shuman, and M. W. Sanderson
Comparison of Student Performance after Lecture-Based and Case-Based/Problem-Based Teaching in a Large Group
J Vet Med Educ, June 1, 2008; 35(2): 310 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
jvmeHome page
V. H.M. Dale, L. Nasir, and M. Sullivan
Evaluation of Student Attitudes to Cooperative Learning in Undergraduate Veterinary Medicine
J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2005; 32(4): 511 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
AAVMC APPRECIATES THE SUPPORT OF OUR TWO PATRONS, HILL'S PET NUTRITION AND BAYER ANIMAL HEALTH, WHO IN COMBINATION ARE FULLY SUPPORTING THIS SITE.
Hill's Pet Nutrition
Upcoming Veterinary Education Meetings