Veterinary school admission interviews, part 1: literature overview

Office of Academic Affairs, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. turnwald@vt.edu

An analysis of the admission interview used by schools in four health professions (veterinary medicine, allopathic medicine, optometry, and dentistry) portrays a largely similar approach to selection interviews: INTERVIEW USE: At least 80% of schools interview applicants. For schools that offer interviews, at least 40% of candidates are interviewed (a strong academic profile is the number one determinant of receiving an interview offer). The interview is one of the three most important selection tools used by schools. Less than 26% of schools fix the interview's weight in the selection process (fixed weights range from 31% to 35%). INTERVIEW PURPOSE AND CONTENT: The most common purposes of the interview are to (1) gather information, (2) make decisions, (3) verify information provided in other parts of the application, (4) recruit candidates, and/or (5) promote public relations. The most common characteristics and skills interviewers are interested in assessing are motivation for the profession, interpersonal skills, and communication skills. The desire to assess cognitive ability with the interview (>25% of schools) is surprising in view of the use of other selection tools (e.g., GPA). INTERVIEW FORMAT: Medical schools are more likely to offer two interviews per candidate, while optometry schools are more likely to offer one interview per candidate. Individual interviews (one interviewer, one candidate) are the predominant format among medical schools, while panel interviews (more than one interviewer, one candidate) are the most common format among optometry schools. The duration of the interview is 30 to 45 minutes. Interview questions most often address facts and knowledge, hypothetical situations, and the ability to meet program requirements. Most interviews do not meet the criteria for a structured interview, which has demonstrated greater validity and reliability than semi-structured or unstructured interviews. INTERVIEWERS: Interviewers are most likely to be health care faculty members (e.g., veterinarians at a veterinary school). Interviewers receive limited training. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INCREASING INTERVIEW RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY: The purpose(s) of the interview must be clearly articulated so that the interview and interviewer training can be designed to achieve that purpose. Interview structure should be increased by developing a "job analysis" set of questions that is posed to all candidates and scored using behavioral anchors. Interviewers should receive more training in rater bias, listening skills, and interview structure. Panel interviews should be used to increase reliability. Interviewers should not have access to the candidate's application unless the interview is used to verify information. To increase the utility of the interview in the selection process, the weight of the interview in relation to other selection components should be determined.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H.S. van der Walt and G. Pickworth Personality and Academic Performance of Three Cohorts of Veterinary Students in South Africa J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(3): 356 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Kunzel and S. M. Breit Admissions Procedures at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(5): 639 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

AAVMC APPRECIATES THE SUPPORT OF OUR TWO PATRONS, HILL'S PET NUTRITION AND BAYER ANIMAL HEALTH, WHO IN COMBINATION ARE FULLY SUPPORTING THIS SITE.